The Cartesian Cafe

Justin Clarke-Doane | Mathematics, Reality, and Morality

Justin Clarke-Doane is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University, whose interests span metaethics, epistemology, and the philosophy of logic & mathematics.
In this thought provoking-discussion, Justin and I go deep into topics that are typically neglected by most mathematicians and scientists, namely the philosophy of mathematics and morality. Justin has contributed to both these areas via his book Morality and Mathematics, which takes the view that the standard position of being both a mathematical realist and moral antirealist is incoherent. Perhaps the most novel aspect of Justin's work is the treatment of the philosophy of mathematics and morality side-by-side, showing how these two topics, which are usually thought of as being unrelated, in fact have strong analogies. Along the way, we discuss many other foundational topics in epistemology and ethics, with elements of set theory, metaphysics, and logic sprinkled in.
Patreon (bonus materials + video chat): https://www.patreon.com/timothynguyen
Part I. Introduction
00:00 : Preview
01:56 : Naturalism & Mathematical vs Moral Realism
05:34 : Outline of the Discussion
Part II. Philosophy of Mathematics
13:25 : Mathematical Realism
18:36 : The Reality of Numbers
27:58 : Anti-Realist Positions in Mathematics
41:49 : Fictionalism in Mathematics
44:06 : Distinguishing Metaphysics from Epistemology
45:39 : The Role of Naturalism and Fictionalism
Part III. Philosophy of Morality (vs Mathematics)
50:24 : Moral Realism and Anti-Realism
58:31 : Analogies Between Mathematical and Moral Realism
01:05:30 : Kant's Constructivism and Ethical Contextualism
01:10:40 : Error Theory in Ethics
01:16:02 : Mathematical Realism and Moral Anti-Realism
01:17:22 : Contextualism and Moral Realism
Part IV. Select Topics from Justin's Book
01:19:11 : Justification and Self-Evidence
01:21:24 : The Practice of Axiomatization: Mathematics vs Ethics
01:24:51 : Pushback: Is there really controversy in math?
01:30:24 : Justification and Belief: Quinean Empiricism and Harman's Thesis
01:41:44 : Observations, Explanations, and Moral Facts
01:48:41 : Supervenience and High-Level Descriptions
02:00:43 : Justification vs Truth: Reliability Challenge in Mathematics and Morality
02:03:53 : 2+2 not equaling 4: Accidental Truth vs Truth per se
02:13:10 : Pluralism in Mathematics and Ethics
02:31:27 : Concluding Thoughts
02:32:49 : Correction: "relativism" should be "realism"
Further reading:Justin Clarke-Doane. Morality and Mathematics.
 
X: @iamtimnguyen
 
Webpage: http://www.timothynguyen.org

Jay McClelland | Neural Networks: Artificial and Biological

Jay McClelland is a pioneer in the field of artificial intelligence and is a cognitive psychologist and professor at Stanford University in the psychology, linguistics, and computer science departments. Together with David Rumelhart, Jay published the two volume work Parallel Distributed Processing, which has led to the flourishing of the connectionist approach to understanding cognition.
In this conversation, Jay gives us a crash course in how neurons and biological brains work. This sets the stage for how psychologists such as Jay, David Rumelhart, and Geoffrey Hinton historically approached the development of models of cognition and ultimately artificial intelligence. We also discuss alternative approaches to neural computation such as symbolic and neuroscientific ones.
Patreon (bonus materials + video chat):https://www.patreon.com/timothynguyen
Part I. Introduction
00:00 : Preview
01:10 : Cognitive psychology
07:14 : Interdisciplinary work and Jay's academic journey
12:39 : Context affects perception
13:05 : Chomsky and psycholinguists
8:03 : Technical outline
Part II. The Brain
00:20:20 : Structure of neurons
00:25:26 : Action potentials
00:27:00 : Synaptic processes and neuron firing
00:29:18 : Inhibitory neurons
00:33:10 : Feedforward neural networks
00:34:57 : Visual system
00:39:46 : Various parts of the visual cortex
00:45:31 : Columnar organization in the cortex
00:47:04 : Colocation in artificial vs biological networks
00:53:03 : Sensory systems and brain maps
Part III. Approaches to AI, PDP, and Learning Rules
01:12:35 : Chomsky, symbolic rules, universal grammar
01:28:28 : Neuroscience, Francis Crick, vision vs language
01:32:36 : Neuroscience = bottom up
01:37:20 : Jay’s path to AI
01:43:51 : James Anderson
01:44:51 : Geoff Hinton
01:54:25 : Parallel Distributed Processing (PDP)
02:03:40 : McClelland & Rumelhart’s reading model
02:31:25 : Theories of learning
02:35:52 : Hebbian learning
02:43:23 : Rumelhart’s Delta rule
02:44:45 : Gradient descent
02:47:04 : Backpropagation
02:54:52 : Outro: Retrospective and looking ahead
Image credits:http://timothynguyen.org/image-credits/
Further reading:
Rumelhart, McClelland. Parallel Distributed Processing.
McClelland, J. L. (2013). Integrating probabilistic models of perception and interactive neural networks: A historical and tutorial review
 
Twitter: @iamtimnguyen
 
Webpage: http://www.timothynguyen.org

Michael Freedman | A Fields Medalist Panorama

Michael Freedman is a mathematician who was awarded the Fields Medal in 1986 for his solution of the 4-dimensional Poincare conjecture. Mike has also received numerous other awards for his scientific contributions including a MacArthur Fellowship and the National Medal of Science. In 1997, Mike joined Microsoft Research and in 2005 became the director of Station Q, Microsoft’s quantum computing research lab. As of 2023, Mike is a Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Mathematics and Scientific Applications at Harvard University.
Patreon (bonus materials + video chat): https://www.patreon.com/timothynguyen
In this wide-ranging conversation, we give a panoramic view of Mike’s extensive body of work over the span of his career. It is divided into three parts: early, middle, and present day, which respectively include his work on the 4-dimensional Poincare conjecture, his transition to topological physics, and finally his recent work in applying ideas from mathematics and philosophy to social economics. Our conversation is a blend of both the nitty-gritty details and the anecdotal story-telling that can only be obtained from a living legend.
I. Introduction
00:00 : Preview
01:34 : Fields Medalist working in industry
03:24 : Academia vs industry
04:59 : Mathematics and art
06:33 : Technical overview
II. Early Mike: The Poincare Conjecture (PC)
08:14 : Introduction, statement, and history
14:30 : Three categories for PC (topological, smooth, PL)
17:09 : Smale and PC for d at least 5
17:59 : Homotopy equivalence vs homeomorphism
22:08 : Joke
23:24 : Morse flow
33:21 : Whitney Disk
41:47 : Casson handles
50:24 : Manifold factors and the Whitehead continuum
1:00:39 : Donaldson’s results in the smooth category
1:04:54 : (Not) writing up full details of the proof then and now
1:08:56 : Why Perelman succeeded
II. Mid Mike: Topological Quantum Field Theory (TQFT) and Quantum Computing (QC)
1:10:54: Introduction
1:11:42: Cliff Taubes, Raoul Bott, Ed Witten
1:12:40 : Computational complexity, Church-Turing, and Mike’s motivations
1:24:01 : Why Mike left academia, Microsoft’s offer, and Station Q
1:29:23 : Topological quantum field theory (according to Atiyah)
1:34:29 : Anyons and a theorem on Chern-Simons theories
1:38:57 : Relation to QC
1:46:08 : Universal TQFT
1:55:57 : Witten: Donalson theory cannot be a unitary TQFT
2:01:22 : Unitarity is possible in dimension 3
2:05:12 : Relations to a theory of everything?
2:07:21 : Where topological QC is now
III. Present Mike: Social Economics
2:11:08 : Introduction
2:14:02 : Lionel Penrose and voting schemes
2:21:01 : Radical markets (pun intended)
2:25:45 : Quadratic finance/funding
2:30:51 : Kant’s categorical imperative and a paper of Vitalik Buterin, Zoe Hitzig, Glen Weyl
2:36:54 : Gauge equivariance
2:38:32 : Bertrand Russell: philosophers and differential equations
IV: Outro
2:46:20 : Final thoughts on math, science, philosophy
2:51:22 : Career advice
 
Some Further Reading:Mike’s Harvard lecture on PC4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSF0i6BO1IgBehrens et al. The Disc Embedding Theorem.M. Freedman. Spinoza, Leibniz, Kant, and Weyl. arxiv:2206.14711
 
Twitter:@iamtimnguyen
 
Webpage:http://www.timothynguyen.org

Marcus Hutter | Universal Artificial Intelligence and Solomonoff Induction

Marcus Hutter is an artificial intelligence researcher who is both a Senior Researcher at Google DeepMind and an Honorary Professor in the Research School of Computer Science at Australian National University. He is responsible for the development of the theory of Universal Artificial Intelligence, for which he has written two books, one back in 2005 and one coming right off the press as we speak. Marcus is also the creator of the Hutter prize, for which you can win a sizable fortune for achieving state of the art lossless compression of Wikipedia text.
Patreon (bonus materials + video chat): https://www.patreon.com/timothynguyen
In this technical conversation, we cover material from Marcus’s two books “Universal Artificial Intelligence” (2005) and “Introduction to Universal Artificial Intelligence” (2024). The main goal is to develop a mathematical theory for combining sequential prediction (which seeks to predict the distribution of the next observation) together with action (which seeks to maximize expected reward), since these are among the problems that intelligent agents face when interacting in an unknown environment. Solomonoff induction provides a universal approach to sequence prediction in that it constructs an optimal prior (in a certain sense) over the space of all computable distributions of sequences, thus enabling Bayesian updating to enable convergence to the true predictive distribution (assuming the latter is computable). Combining Solomonoff induction with optimal action leads us to an agent known as AIXI, which in this theoretical setting, can be argued to be a mathematical incarnation of artificial general intelligence (AGI): it is an agent which acts optimally in general, unknown environments. The second half of our discussion concerning agents assumes familiarity with the basic setup of reinforcement learning.
I. Introduction
00:38 : Biography
01:45 : From Physics to AI
03:05 : Hutter Prize
06:25 : Overview of Universal Artificial Intelligence
11:10 : Technical outline
II. Universal Prediction
18:27 : Laplace’s Rule and Bayesian Sequence Prediction
40:54 : Different priors: KT estimator
44:39 : Sequence prediction for countable hypothesis class
53:23 : Generalized Solomonoff Bound (GSB)
57:56 : Example of GSB for uniform prior
1:04:24 : GSB for continuous hypothesis classes
1:08:28 : Context tree weighting
1:12:31 : Kolmogorov complexity
1:19:36 : Solomonoff Bound & Solomonoff Induction
1:21:27 : Optimality of Solomonoff Induction
1:24:48 : Solomonoff a priori distribution in terms of random Turing machines
1:28:37 : Large Language Models (LLMs)
1:37:07 : Using LLMs to emulate Solomonoff induction
1:41:41 : Loss functions
1:50:59 : Optimality of Solomonoff induction revisited
1:51:51 : Marvin Minsky
III. Universal Agents
1:52:42 : Recap and intro
1:55:59 : Setup
2:06:32 : Bayesian mixture environment
2:08:02 : AIxi. Bayes optimal policy vs optimal policy
2:11:27 : AIXI (AIxi with xi = Solomonoff a priori distribution)
2:12:04 : AIXI and AGI. Clarification: ASI (Artificial Super Intelligence) would be a more appropriate term than AGI for the AIXI agent.
2:12:41 : Legg-Hutter measure of intelligence
2:15:35 : AIXI explicit formula
2:23:53 : Other agents (optimistic agent, Thompson sampling, etc)
2:33:09 : Multiagent setting
2:39:38 : Grain of Truth problem
2:44:38 : Positive solution to Grain of Truth guarantees convergence to a Nash equilibria
2:45:01 : Computable approximations (simplifying assumptions on model classes): MDP, CTW, LLMs
2:56:13 : Outro: Brief philosophical remarks
 
Further Reading:M. Hutter, D. Quarrel, E. Catt. An Introduction to Universal Artificial IntelligenceM. Hutter. Universal Artificial IntelligenceS. Legg and M. Hutter. Universal Intelligence: A Definition of Machine Intelligence
 
Twitter: @iamtimnguyen
Webpage: http://www.timothynguyen.org

Richard Borcherds | Monstrous Moonshine: From Group Theory to String Theory

Richard Borcherds is a mathematician and professor at University of California Berkeley known for his work on lattices, group theory, and infinite-dimensional algebras. His numerous accolades include being awarded the Fields Medal in 1998 and being elected a fellow of the American Mathematical Society and the National Academy of Sciences.
Patreon (bonus materials + video chat): https://www.patreon.com/timothynguyen
In this episode, Richard and I give an overview of Richard's most famous result: his proof of the Monstrous Moonshine conjecture relating the monster group on the one hand and modular forms on the other. A remarkable feature of the proof is that it involves vertex algebras inspired from elements of string theory. Some familiarity with group theory and representation theory are assumed in our discussion.
I. Introduction
00:25: Biography
02:51 : Success in mathematics
04:04 : Monstrous Moonshine overview and John Conway
09:44 : Technical overview
II. Group Theory
11:31 : Classification of finite-simple groups + history of the monster group
18:03 : Conway groups + Leech lattice
22:13 : Why was the monster conjectured to exist + more history 28:43 : Centralizers and involutions
32:37: Griess algebra
III. Modular Forms
36:42 : Definitions
40:06 : The elliptic modular function
48:58 : Subgroups of SL_2(Z)
IV. Monstrous Moonshine Conjecture Statement
57:17: Representations of the monster
59:22 : Hauptmoduls
1:03:50 : Statement of the conjecture
1:07:06 : Atkin-Fong-Smith's first proof
1:09:34 : Frenkel-Lepowski-Meurman's work + significance of Borcherd's proof
V. Sketch of Proof
1:14:47: Vertex algebra and monster Lie algebra
1:21:02 : No ghost theorem from string theory
1:25:24 : What's special about dimension 26?
1:28:33 : Monster Lie algebra details
1:32:30 : Dynkin diagrams and Kac-Moody algebras
1:43:21 : Simple roots and an obscure identity
1:45:13: Weyl denominator formula, Vandermonde identity
1:52:14 : Chasing down where modular forms got smuggled in
1:55:03 : Final calculations
VI. Epilogue
1:57:53 : Your most proud result?
2:00:47 : Monstrous moonshine for other sporadic groups?
2:02:28 : Connections to other fields. Witten and black holes and mock modular forms.
 
Further reading: V Tatitschef. A short introduction to Monstrous Moonshine. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.03118.pdf
Twitter: @iamtimnguyen
Webpage: http://www.timothynguyen.org

Announcements for 2024 and a Message to Viewers

Thought I'd share some exciting news about what's happening at The Cartesian Cafe in 2024 and also a personal message to viewers on how they can support the cafe.
Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/timothynguyen

Tim Maudlin | Bell’s Theorem and Beyond: Nobody Understands Quantum Mechanics

Tim Maudlin is a philosopher of science specializing in the foundations of physics, metaphysics, and logic. He is a professor at New York University, a member of the Foundational Questions Institute, and the founder and director of the John Bell Institute for the Foundations of Physics.
Patreon (bonus materials + video chat):https://www.patreon.com/timothynguyen
In this very in-depth discussion, Tim and I probe the foundations of science through the avenues of locality and determinism as arising from the Einstein-Poldosky-Rosen (EPR) paradox and Bell's Theorem. These issues are so intricate that even the Nobel Prize committee incorrectly described the significance of Bell's work in their press release for the 2022 prize in physics. Viewers motivated enough to think deeply about these ideas will be rewarded with a conceptually proper understanding of the nonlocal nature of physics and its manifestation in quantum theory.
I. Introduction 00:00 :
00:25: Biography
05:26: Interdisciplinary work
11:54 : Physicists working on the wrong things
16:47 : Bell's Theorem soft overview
24:14: Common misunderstanding of "God does not play dice."
25:59: Technical outline
II. EPR Paradox / Argument
29:14 : EPR is not a paradox
34:57 : Criterion of reality
43:57 : Mathematical formulation
46:32 : Locality: No spooky action at a distance
49:54 : Bertlmann's socks
53:17 : EPR syllogism summarized
54:52 : Determinism is inferred not assumed
1:02:18 : Clarifying analogy: Coin flips
1:06:39 : Einstein's objection to determinism revisited
III. Bohm Segue
1:11:05 : Introduction
1:13:38: Bell and von Neumann's error
1:20:14: Bell's motivation: Can I remove Bohm's nonlocality?
IV. Bell's Theorem and Related Examples
1:25:13 : Setup
1:27:59 : Decoding Bell's words: Locality is the key!
1:34:16 : Bell's inequality (overview)
1:36:46 : Bell's inequality (math)
1:39:15 : Concrete example of violation of Bell's inequality
1:49:42: GHZ Example
V. Miscellany
2:06:23 : Statistical independence assumption
2:13:18: The 2022 Nobel Prize
2:17:43: Misconceptions and hidden variables
2:22:28: The assumption of local realism? Repeat: Determinism is a conclusion not an assumption.
VI. Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
2:28:44: Interpretation is a misnomer
2:29:48: Three requirements. You can only pick two.
2:34:52: Copenhagen interpretation?
 
Further Reading:
J. Bell. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics
T. Maudlin. Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity
Wikipedia: Mermin's device, GHZ experiment
 
Twitter: @iamtimnguyen
Webpage: http://www.timothynguyen.org

Antonio Padilla | Fantastic Numbers, Naturalness, and Anthropics in Physics

Antonio (Tony) Padilla is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist at the University of Nottingham. He serves as the Associate Director of the Nottingham Centre of Gravity, and in 2016, Tony shared the Buchalter Cosmology Prize for his work on the cosmological constant. Tony is also a star of the Numberphile YouTube channel, where his videos have received millions of views and he is also the author of the book Fantastic Numbers and Where to Find Them: A Cosmic Quest from Zero to Infinity.
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/timothynguyen
This episode combines some of the greatest cosmological questions together with mathematical imagination. Tony and I go through the math behind some oft-quoted numbers in cosmology and calculate the age, size, and number of atoms in the universe. We then stretch our brains and consider how likely it would be to find your Doppelganger in a truly large universe, which takes us on a detour through black hole entropy. We end with a discussion of naturalness and the anthropic principle to round out our discussion of fantastic numbers in physics.
Part I. Introduction
00:00 : Introduction
01:06 : Math and or versus physics
12:09 : Backstory behind Tony's book
14:12 : Joke about theoreticians and numbers
16:18 : Technical outline
Part II. Size, Age, and Quantity in the Universe
21:42 : Size of the observable universe
22:32 : Standard candles
27:39 : Hubble rate
29:02 : Measuring distances and time
37:15 : Einstein and Minkowski
40:52 : Definition of Hubble parameter
42:14 : Friedmann equation
47:11 : Calculating the size of the observable universe
51:24 : Age of the universe
56:14 : Number of atoms in the observable universe
1:01:08 : Critical density
1:03:16: 10^80 atoms of hydrogen
1:03:46 : Universe versus observable universe
Part III. Extreme Physics and Doppelgangers
1:07:27 : Long-term fate of the universe
1:08:28 : Black holes and a googol years
1:09:59 : Poincare recurrence
1:13:23 : Doppelgangers in a googolplex meter wide universe
1:16:40 : Finitely many states and black hole entropy
1:25:00 : Black holes have no hair
1:29:30 : Beckenstein, Christodolou, Hawking
1:33:12 : Susskind's thought experiment: Maximum entropy of space
1:42:58 : Estimating the number of doppelgangers
1:54:21 : Poincare recurrence: Tower of four exponents.
Part IV: Naturalness and Anthropics
1:54:34 : What is naturalness? Examples.
2:04:09 : Cosmological constant problem: 10^120 discrepancy
2:07:29 : Interlude: Energy shift clarification. Gravity is key.
2:15:34 : Corrections to the cosmological constant
2:18:47 : String theory landscape: 10^500 possibilities
2:20:41 : Anthropic selection
2:25:59 : Is the anthropic principle unscientific? Weinberg and predictions.
2:29:17 : Vacuum sequestration
Further reading: Antonio Padilla. Fantastic Numbers and Where to Find Them: A Cosmic Quest from Zero to Infinity
Twitter: @iamtimnguyen
Webpage: http://www.timothynguyen.org

Boaz Barak | Cryptography: The Art of Mathematical Secrecy

Boaz Barak is a professor of computer science at Harvard University, having previously been a principal researcher at Microsoft Research and a professor at Princeton University. His research interests span many areas of theoretical computer science including cryptography, computational complexity, and the foundations of machine learning. Boaz serves on the scientific advisory boards for Quanta Magazine and the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing and he was selected for Foreign Policy magazine’s list of 100 leading global thinkers for 2014.
www.patreon.com/timothynguyen
Cryptography is about maintaining the privacy and security of communication. In this episode, Boaz and I go through the fundamentals of cryptography from a foundational mathematical perspective. We start with some historical examples of attempts at encrypting messages and how they failed. After some guesses as to how one might mathematically define security, we arrive at the one due to Shannon. The resulting definition of perfect secrecy turns out to be too rigid, which leads us to the notion of computational secrecy that forms the foundation of modern cryptographic systems. We then show how the existence of pseudorandom generators (which remains a conjecture) ensures that such computational secrecy is achievable, assuming P does not equal NP. Having covered private key cryptography in detail, we then give a brief overview of public key cryptography. We end with a brief discussion of Bitcoin, machine learning, deepfakes, and potential doomsday scenarios.
I. Introduction
00:17 : Biography: Academia vs Industry
10:07 : Military service
12:53 : Technical overview
17:01 : Whiteboard outline
II. Warmup
24:42 : Substitution ciphers
27:33 : Viginere cipher
29:35 : Babbage and Kasiski
31:25 : Enigma and WW2
33:10 : Alan Turing
III. Private Key Cryptography: Perfect Secrecy
34:32 : Valid encryption scheme
40:14 : Kerckhoffs's Principle
42:41 : Cryptography = steelman your adversary
44:40 : Attempt #1 at perfect secrecy
49:58 : Attempt #2 at perfect secrecy
56:02 : Definition of perfect secrecy (Shannon)
1:05:56 : Enigma was not perfectly secure
1:08:51 : Analogy with differential privacy
1:11:10 : Example: One-time pad (OTP)
1:20:07 : Drawbacks of OTP and Soviet KGB misuse
1:21:43 : Important: Keys cannot be reused!
1:27:48 : Shannon's Impossibility Theorem
IV. Computational Secrecy
1:32:52 : Relax perfect secrecy to computational secrecy
1:41:04 : What computational secrecy buys (if P is not NP)
1:44:35 : Pseudorandom generators (PRGs)
1:47:03 : PRG definition
1:52:30 : PRGs and P vs NP
1:55:47: PRGs enable modifying OTP for computational secrecy
V. Public Key Cryptography
2:00:32 : Limitations of private key cryptography
2:09:25 : Overview of public key methods
2:13:28 : Post quantum cryptography
VI. Applications
2:14:39 : Bitcoin
2:18:21 : Digital signatures (authentication)
2:23:56 : Machine learning and deepfakes
2:30:31 : A conceivable doomsday scenario: P = NP
Further reading: Boaz Barak. An Intensive Introduction to Cryptography
Twitter: @iamtimnguyen
Webpage: http://www.timothynguyen.org

Sean Carroll | The Many Worlds Interpretation & Emergent Spacetime

Sean Carroll is a theoretical physicist and philosopher who specializes in quantum mechanics, cosmology, and the philosophy of science. He is the Homewood Professor of Natural Philosophy at Johns Hopkins University and an external professor at the Sante Fe Institute. Sean has contributed prolifically to the public understanding of science through a variety of mediums: as an author of several physics books including Something Deeply Hidden and The Biggest Ideas in the Universe, as a public speaker and debater on a wide variety of scientific and philosophical subjects, and also as a host of his podcast Mindscape which covers topics spanning science, society, philosophy, culture, and the arts.
www.patreon.com/timothynguyen
In this episode, we take a deep dive into The Many Worlds (Everettian) Interpretation of quantum mechanics. While there are many philosophical discussions of the Many Worlds Interpretation available, ours marries philosophy with the technical, mathematical details. As a bonus, the whole gamut of topics from philosophy and physics arise, including the nature of reality, emergence, Bohmian mechanics, Bell's Theorem, and more. We conclude with some analysis of Sean's speculative work on the concept of emergent spacetime, a viewpoint which naturally arises from Many Worlds. This video is most suitable for those with a basic technical understanding of quantum mechanics.
Part I: Introduction
00:00:00 : Introduction
00:05:42 : Philosophy and science: more interdisciplinary work?
00:09:14 : How Sean got interested in Many Worlds (MW)
00:13:04 : Technical outline
Part II: Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell
00:14:58 : Textbook QM review
00:24:25 : The measurement problem
00:25:28 : Einstein: "God does not play dice"
00:27:49 : The reality problem
Part III: Many Worlds
00:31:53 : How MW comes in
00:34:28 : EPR paradox (original formulation)
00:40:58 : Simpler to work with spin
00:42:03 : Spin entanglement
00:44:46 : Decoherence
00:49:16 : System, observer, environment clarification for decoherence
00:53:54 : Density matrix perspective (sketch)
00:56:21 : Deriving the Born rule
00:59:09 : Everett: right answer, wrong reason. The easy and hard part of Born's rule.
01:03:33 : Self-locating uncertainty: which world am I in?
01:04:59 : Two arguments for Born rule credences
01:11:28 : Observer-system split: pointer-state problem
01:13:11 : Schrodinger's cat and decoherence
01:18:21 : Consciousness and perception
01:21:12 : Emergence and MW
01:28:06 : Sorites Paradox and are there infinitely many worlds
01:32:50 : Bad objection to MW: "It's not falsifiable."
Part IV: Additional Topics
01:35:13 : Bohmian mechanics
01:40:29 : Bell's Theorem. What the Nobel Prize committee got wrong
01:41:56 : David Deutsch on Bohmian mechanics
01:46:39 : Quantum mereology
01:49:09 : Path integral and double slit: virtual and distinct worlds
Part V. Emergent Spacetime
01:55:05 : Setup
02:02:42 : Algebraic geometry / functional analysis perspective
02:04:54 : Relation to MW
Part VI. Conclusion
02:07:16 : Distribution of QM beliefs
02:08:38 : Locality
 
Further reading:
Hugh Everett. The Theory of the Universal Wave Function, 1956.
Sean Carroll. Something Deeply Hidden, 2019.
More Sean Carroll & Timothy Nguyen:
Fragments of the IDW: Joe Rogan, Sam Harris, Eric Weinstein: https://youtu.be/jM2FQrRYyas
Twitter: @iamtimnguyen
Webpage: http://www.timothynguyen.org